This cross-sectional study describes the characteristics and trends of health sciences-related studies published in Ecuador from 1999-2009. Its objective is to contribute to the design and implementation of a research and development policy whose work is centered on the country's health priorities. Bibliometric indicators of production applied to publications in health sciences in Ecuador were used for the analysis. The publications were from the LILACS and MEDLINE databases. It was found that 625 articles were published from 1999-2009, primarily in the clinical-surgical areas (60%), followed by epidemiology (17.4%), basic sciences (14.1%), and health systems (8.5%). Only 4.3% and 7.2% of the production in this period was related to the primary causes of morbidity and mortality, respectively. It was found that private institutions generated more health research than public institutions, and hospitals (public, private, and mixed) produced a higher percentage than universities. The analysis showed that there was limited scientific production in health sciences in Ecuador during the study period, with a slight increase in the last two years that may be due in part to greater investment in research and development by the National Secretariat of Science and Technology (SENACYT). Investment increased from 0.20% to 0.44% of gross domestic product between 2006 and 2009.

El presente trabajo, de corte transversal, describe características y tendencias de los trabajos relacionados con las ciencias de la salud (CS) publicados en Ecuador durante el período 1999-2009. Su objetivo es contribuir al diseño e implementación de una política de investigación y desarrollo que centre sus esfuerzos en las prioridades de salud del país. Para el análisis se utilizaron indicadores bibliométricos de producción aplicados a las publicaciones científicas en CS de Ecuador, contenidas en las bases de datos LILACS y MEDLINE. Se halló que durante 1999-2009 se publicaron 625 artículos, observándose un predominio de las áreas clínico-quirúrgicas (60%) seguidas de la epidemiología (17,4%), las ciencias básicas (14,1%) y los sistemas de salud (8,5%). De todo lo producido durante ese período, solo 4,3% y 7,2% estaban relacionados con las principales causas de morbilidad y mortalidad, respectivamente. Se encontró que las instituciones privadas generaron más investigación en salud que las públicas, y los hospitales (públicos, privados y mixtos) en mayor proporción que las universidades. Del análisis realizado se puede decir que la producción científica en CS en Ecuador durante 1999-2009 ha sido escasa, con un leve repunte en los dos últimos años, que en parte podría explicarse por el aumento en la inversión en investigación y desarrollo a través de la Secretaría Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (SENACYT), la cual entre 2006 y 2009 pasó de 0,20% a 0,44% del producto interno bruto.

The importance of racial factors in the epidemiology and clinical manifestations of onchocercosis in the Afro-Ecuadorian and Chachi indigenous races, two distinct ethnic groups in the hyperendemic area of the Ecuadorian onchocercal focus, were evaluated. No difference in the disease prevalence among the two races was noted, although the Chachi had a significant higher dermal microfilariae intensity. Approximately 72.2% of the Afro-Ecuadorians presented with onchocercal skin lesions, as compared to 56.4% of the Chachi. Pretibial depigmentation, sowdah, scrotal elephantiasis and hydrocele were only documented in the Afro-Ecuadorians. Greater prevalence of palpable nodules was found in the Chachi (51.4% vs. 43.0%). Chachi presented with more nodules in the head (25.6% vs 17.6%) and iliac crest (40.1% vs. 30.3%) regions while the Blacks had more nodules in the sacrococcygeal region (18.2% vs 10.8%). Microfilariae in the anterior chamber was seen more frequently in the Chachi (51.9% vs 34.2%). However, a higher prevalence of chorioretinitis and optic atrophy was seen in the Afro-Ecuadorians (17.6% vs 11.2% and 8.5% vs 0.5% respectively). Several possible causes for these differences are discussed

Se evaluó la importancia de los factores raciales en la epidemiología y las manifestaciones clínicas de la oncocercosis en la raza Negra y la raza indígena Chachi, dos grupos étnicos diferentes del área hiperendémica del foco oncocercótico ecuatoriano. Los Chachi presentaron una significativa mayor densidad de microfilarias en la piel. De los Negros, 72,2% presentaron lesiones oncocercóticas en la piel comparado con 56,4% en los Chachi. Se encontró mayor prevalencia de nódulos palpables en los Chachi (51,4% vs. 43,0%). La presencia de microfilarias en la cámara anterior del ojo fue más frecuente en los Chachi (51,9% vs. 34,2%), pero se evidenció una mayor prevalencia de corioretinitis y atrofia del nervio óptico en los Negros (17,6% vs 11,2% y 8,5% vs. 0,5%, respectivamente)

The prevalence of onchocerciasis infection was determined in communities on 7 rivers located in the northern area of the cantón San Lorenzo, province of Esmeraldas. Diagnosis of the infection was obtained by skin biopsies and recombinant-antigen based-serology. No evidence of infection was detected in 9 communities studied along the Río Mataje, which forms the frontier between Ecuador and Colombia, nor in 10 adjacent communities located on 5 interior rivers. Evidence for Onchocerca volvulus infection was found in 4 communities on the Río Tululví with the following prevalence: La Boca (3.5% by biopsy and 3.9% by serology), Guayabal (9.1% by both biopsy and serology), La Ceiva (51.5% by biopsy and 53% by serology), and Salidero (4% by biopsy and 7.7% by serology). A few individuals in these communities were seropositive for O. volvulus in the absence of detectable dermal microfilariae: these might harbor very light or prepatent infections. No clinical disease attributable to onchocerciasis was found. The infected communities will be included in the ivermectin-based National Control Program for the disease, with no evidence of the infection having extended north of the Ecuadorian-colombian border